|
|
Home > Story
One thing is for certain about the Mazda 2: you will find it impossible to feel like a badass in one. With its smiley-jelly-bean squee factor, you're going to feel more like a Pokemon character, and on the plus side, it's nearly impossible to stay in a bad mood when you glimpse your stub-nosed reflection sailing past in a storefront window. Yep, it's adorable, and like guys who totter around with miniature fluffball dogs, if you're going to own one you will have to get comfortable with that.
Another feature that sets the Mazda 2 apart: with its fuel-sipping 1.5 making barely 100 hp, it the distinction of being the most underpowered vehicle currently on the market. Yowzers! So how does it feel to drive the most gutless subcompact in America? Continue reading...
Surprisingly, not terrible. Sure, you're not going to want to merge onto Interstate traffic from a dead stop, but it's smartly geared and gets up to speed quite quickly for what it is. And it makes a pretty comical racket doing so, with an almost straightpipe-sounding exhaust note that briefly turns the passenger compartment into a hornets' nest under hard accelleration. The torque-steer is terrible, but at least indicates that it's getting at least some of those hundred ponies to the wheels. Feel the power!

Other than the burst of noise when you hit the throttle, the Mazda 2 is actually pretty quiet on the inside, with none of the cheap-and-nasty coarseness of, for example, the Honda Fit (sorry, boss). The handling is very deft, and it's sprung stiff though the ride isn't harsh. The idle does for some reason settle down to around 500 RPM when you come to a stop (I guess for fuel savings?), which makes the car vibrate a little. Aside from that, it felt amazingly smooth and solid for a $14,000 car.
But really, speaking of fuel savings, the main reason you buy a microbot like the Mazda 2 is for mileage. And at 28/34 mpg with the automatic (bump it up to 35 highway with the manual), the Mazda 2 is not exactly a game-changer (that would be the quite similar Ford Fiesta, claiming up to 40 mpg). Add to that the fact that it's got a tiny fuel tank (when it was nearly empty, I was only able to get 7 gallons into it), and you're going to be filling up just as frequently (albeit less expensively) as a car with much more average fuel economy. How are you supposed to feel self-righteous when you're stuck at the pump just as often as the guy with the H2? Really.
All things considered, the Mazda 2 is quite a lovely car for the sub-compact segment. It's going to be difficult to beat out more the even more fuel-efficient and better-powered competition, but maybe that happy smile will tip the scales in its favor.
The 2011 Mazda 2
What's New: The entire tiny thing.
Turn Ons: Solid-feeling build quality and fun handling
Turn Offs: Less-than-stellar power, less-than-stellar fuel mileage
|
|
By: USCG9991 6/14/2011 5:02 PM I shit bigger than that thing |
|
|
By: albania_fier 6/14/2011 7:11 PM well definitely not my style in any aspect, from horsepower to trunk space its all terrible |
|
|
By: BigMike3023 6/14/2011 8:08 PM Perfect for the city dweller. I'd get this thing over a damn Smart car or other hybrid any day! Except for the CR-Z, that thing's grown on me. |
|
|
By: SuzyBruisy 6/14/2011 10:44 PM BigMike: I agree except the Mazda2 was a way better driving experience overall. The CR-Z was way too fussy, and all its faux-hybrid stuff got really annoying :) |
|
|
By: Sixmachine 6/15/2011 9:06 AM It's nice to see another fuel sipping subcompact on the market. With gas currently over a $1.30/L in my city, I'm sure to see lots of Mazda 2's on the road in the near future. I'm not enamoured with the styling though. Like most new cars today, it's got tall doors, upright seating, a high hood and a back end that one can't see out of. Blame this on current safety and packaging concerns..... But I'm sure it is a fun car to zip around in traffic. And maybe, just maybe, the Ford/Mazda connection will bring some turbo charging and direct injection to the product line...... Mazdaspeed 2 anyone? |
|
|
By: PathosBedlam 6/15/2011 12:53 PM Complete waste of time and effort. Car Manufacturers need to give the public what we actually want. An Electric Recharge at home family saloon with a range or 100 to 200km for all the little trips families make for shopping or to work and back if it's close. Preferably with a Solar Panel on the Boot, Roof and Bonnet to recharge as it sits in the car lot for extra mileage. 4 Motors, one in each wheel, also gives good control through electronic stability programs, which act faster and better as it can add power to a wheel, not just controlled braking. Extra power is good for pushing the car back in line. If we need any kind of backup power, we could have a compressed air motor, which is small as, and runs warm, cold enough to hold your hand on it, and have that run a generator. Would be enough to get you home or the nearest recharge station, and won't add extra weight like a petrol engine does. We need to build cars that use no petrol, and leave what is left of that resource for vehicles that can't use electric. Like Mining Trucks or Jets. It's also more carbon efficient to run a car 100km/60miles on $3 of electricity made from Coal than to use petrol or diesel. Electricity is made locally, petrol has to be shipped from the 4 corners of the Earth, wasting more energy and releasing more carbon dioxide. Also if we make our power from Solar Power, Wind Power, Or Wave Power, or Hydro power, we are totally guilt free. That's what I call a Relaxing Drive. |
|
|
By: Art-Man 6/15/2011 1:07 PM I like the SEAT Ibiza more than this.... really |
|
|
By: gold94corolla 6/15/2011 5:46 PM If you are a city dweller, get a bike. I'm telling you, forget cars. The bicycle works wonders and is faster than any car in the city. |
|
|
By: TDWPgtp 6/16/2011 10:00 AM @pathos- im no scientist, but heres what i do know. all of those electric components would kick the price of a car up astronomically. solar panels produce such an insignificant amount of power that it would hardly help a car move. additionally, batteries (amongst all the other electric components) weigh the car down significantly, do not last long, and are worse for the environment than gas will ever be. also, what are you going to use to compress the air? electricity? that would easily be one of the most innefficient ways of doing anything. using electricity to compress air, use compressed air to spin a generator to produce..more electricity? and as far as electric motors go in general, what about in the winter? cold starts? yah, right. and dont count on any heaters in that electric car, yoru battery would be dead in minutes. |
|
|
By: TDWPgtp 6/16/2011 10:04 AM additionally, if we rely too heavily on wind energy, there is a good chance we can disrupt global climate as much as due to carbon. in a series of windmills spaced 300 yards apart in a line, the wind that reaches the 2nd windmill after passing the 1st has lost approximately 90% of its energy. imagine a world FULL of windmills. all of the wind currents of the world would be vastly affected, therefor disrupting the climate far worse than CO2. there is no all in all perfectly safe way to harvest energy. |
|
|
By: ajzhotrodz 6/16/2011 2:57 PM not emough bhp at just 100bhp that sux and mph is bad my 11year old ecsort gets 29/35 mpg its a stick tho but still. |
Please wait while we load the comment form... 


















